Powered by WebAds

Sunday, December 17, 2006

US Neocons expected Israel to attack Syria

This ought to give you an indication of how badly the Olmert-Peretz-Livni government blew the war this summer. This is from a YNet interview with Meyrav Wurmser, wife of David Wurmser, an advisor for Vice President Dick Cheney on Middle Eastern affairs. Wurmser is a Middle East expert, just like his wife, Israeli Meyrav Wurmser, a researcher at the conservative Hudson Institute. Meyrav Wurmser was also one of the co-founders of MEMRI, which tracks Arab leaders and translating their political statements from Arabic to English. Look what she has to say about this past summer's war:
Did the administration expect Israel to attack Syria?

"They hoped Israel would do it. You cannot come to another country and order it to launch a war, but there was hope, and more than hope, that Israel would do the right thing. It would have served both the American and Israeli interests.

"The neocons are responsible for the fact that Israel got a lot of time and spaceā€¦ They believed that Israel should be allowed to win. A great part of it was the thought that Israel should fight against the real enemy, the one backing Hizbullah. It was obvious that it is impossible to fight directly against Iran, but the thought was that its strategic and important ally should be hit."

"It is difficult for Iran to export its Shiite revolution without joining Syria, which is the last nationalistic Arab country. If Israel had hit Syria, it would have been such a harsh blow for Iran, that it would have weakened it and changes the strategic map in the Middle East.

"The final outcome is that Israel did not do it. It fought the wrong war and lost. Instead of a strategic war that would serve Israel's objectives, as well as the US objectives in Iraq. If Syria had been defeated, the rebellion in Iraq would have ended."

Wurmser says that what most frustrates her is hearing people close to decision makers in Israel asking her if the US would have let Israel attack Syria.

"No one would have stopped you. It was an American interest. They would have applauded you. Think why you received so much time and space to operate. Rice was in the region and Israel embarrassed her with Qana, and still Israel got more time. Why aren't they reading the map correctly in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem?"
Good question. I think it's because Olmert doesn't want to read the map correctly, because it doesn't fit his world view.

2 Comments:

At 3:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah I agree with this assessment. I'm just an Aussie chick in Melbourne, and I could see it, and waited. Hmmm, nothing, and instead of a great victory we got a snivelling retreat and a propaganda bonanza for terrorists. Olmert missed a great opportunity, but then he's a liberal, he's more interested in being nice not right.

 
At 4:50 AM, Blogger Bob Miller said...

There is a lot of spinning going on, and it's not clear that this isn't more of it.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Google